Research on the compensation for mental damage in breach of contract Abstract The compensation for breach of contract damages refers to the way that the injured party can sue for breach of contract when the party's breach of contract leads to serious mental damage. The academic circles of our country can claim compensation for this topic has been controversial mental damage in breach of contract, and in the legislative level, also did not respond, the judicial practice in solving such problems not to be found. With the development of human life evolution from simple to complex, the mental damage caused by breach of compensation has become a kind of objective existence, but the theory of civil law only acknowledges the mental damage occurred in the tort liability of the occasion, when the default does make the contract relative party spirit damage, according to the theory of concurrence of liability for tort claim exercise, in order to realize the relief of mental damage. The traditional theory questioned that the rights of the parties to rely solely on the concurrence of liability theory and can't get adequate relief, such as certain types of contract, breach of the serious mental damage caused by the victim, but does not constitute a legal infringement, in this case there will be right legislation blank relief, making the victim right cannot get effective relief. Therefore, our country should break through the shackles of the traditional theory, learn from the advanced experience of foreign legislative cases, to recognize the spirit damage compensation under the liability of breach of contract, and establish the system of compensation for mental damage in breach of contract. In this paper, besides preface and conclusion is divided into three chapters: the first chapter is mainly through the list of three typical cases, liability for breach of contract that does exist in the mental damage compensation problem, combined with the analysis of the case verdict, the traditional theory about the mental damage compensation is not sufficient to fully remedy the rights of the parties; the main contents of the second the chapter is necessary to prove the existence of the system of compensation for moral damage, through the perspective of comparative law, in China denied the spiritual damages in the liability for breach of contract view refuted the legislation precedent to contrast abroad for the moral damage compensation system in breach of the attitude change process, it is necessary to the existence of the system; the third chapter is the author for our spiritual damage compensation system design proposal, the breach of the spirit damage to the current system of legislation Mode selection, confirmation of our country should adopt "the general prohibition of exceptions" mode, and summarizes the types of contract exceptions "covered, and the elements of moral damage in breach of contract is strictly established, in order to limit the judges too much discretion, to better protect the rights of victims. Keywords： Mental damage compensation, Liability for breach of contract, Typed contract, Constitutive requirements

违约责任中的精神损害赔偿问题研究 摘 要 违约精神损害赔偿是指因一方之违约行为导致对方遭受严重精神损害之时， 受害方得以提起违约之诉的方式请求精神损害赔偿。我国学术界对于违约责任中 能否请求精神损害赔偿这个论题一直颇具争议，且在立法层面也未曾对此做出规 定，使得司法实践在解决此类问题时无据可寻。随着人类生活活动从简到繁的演变，由违约责任而导致的精神损害赔偿成为一种客观的存在，但是以往的民法理论仅承认精神损害发生于侵权责任的场合，当违约确实使合同相对方产生精神损害时，认为根据责任竞合理论行使侵权请求权，以此来实现对精神损害的救济。 本文对于传统的理论观点提出质疑，认为仅依靠责任竞合的理论并不能使当事人的权利得到充分的救济，例如一些特定类型的合同中，违约行为造成受害人严重 精神损害，但却不构成法定侵权，在这种情况下就会存在权利救济的立法空白， 使得受害人的权利无法得到有效的救济。因此，我国应当突破传统理论的束缚， 借鉴国外立法判例先进经验，对违约责任下的精神损害赔偿予以承认，建立适合国情的违约精神损害赔偿制度。 本文除前言及结论外分为三个章节：第一章主要是通过列举三个典型性案例， 说明违约责任中确实存在精神损害赔偿问题，并结合对于案例判决结果的分析， 得出关于精神损害赔偿的传统理论不足以完全救济当事人权利的观点；第二章的主要内容是证明违约精神损害赔偿制度存在的必要性，通过比较法的视角，对国内关于否认违约责任中适用精神损害的观点进行驳斥，同时借以对比国外立法判例对于违约精神损害赔偿制度态度的转变历程，论证此制度存在之必要；第三章是笔者对于我国违约精神损害赔偿制度设计的建议，通过对现行几种违约精神损害制度的立法模式选择，确认我国应当采取“一般禁止例外允许”的模式，同时总结“例外允许”所涵盖的类型化合同范围，并对违约精神损害的构成要件进行严格确立，以此来限制法官过大的自由裁量权，更好地保护受害人的权利。 关键词：精神损害赔偿，违约责任，类型化合同，构成要件