ABSTRACT Jurisdictional agreement is one of the basic system in international civil and commercial jurisdiction structure. The rules in Brussels system and Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement can stand for the easing trend of jurisdiction agreement in international community. The Judgment Arrangement between the Mainland and the HKSAR is built on the Hague Convention, and it draws lessons from Hague Convention just on its judgment recognition and enforcement provisions, not including jurisdiction agreement rules. However the most pressing problem in the interregional judicial cooperation is the conflicting jurisdiction rules in the two area. The most critical thing to improve the Judgment Arrangement is to follow the guidance of one country two systems principle, go deep to the details of respective internal laws, do an in-depth study on the choice of forum rules and practices, including the formal validity and material validity of a jurisdiction agreement, the law applicable to a jurisdiction agreement, the effectiveness of a jurisdiction agreement, the limitations on a jurisdiction agreement, then explore a cooperational mechanism on jurisdiction agreement between the Mainland and Hong Kong, and give feasible suggestions to the upcoming modification of the Judgment Arrangement, Moreover, the Judgment Arrangement should be further developed by referring to the jurisdiction agreement provisions in Hague Convention and Brussels system, The Judgment Arrangement is built on the Hague Convention, so its improvement definitely should refer to Hague Convention. Brussels system is a more comprehensive system than Hague Convention, so the cooperation of jurisdiction agreement between the Mainland and Hong Kong should draw lessons from the Brussels system. Key words: Mainland and Hong Kong, Jurisdiction Agreement, Judgment Arrangement between the Mainland and the HKSAR, Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Brussels System

摘要 協議管轄制度是國際民商事管轄權的基本制度之一，布魯塞爾管轄權體系和《海牙選擇法院協議公約》對管轄協議的規定代表了國際社會中協議管轄制度發展的最新趨勢。《內港判決安排》以《海牙選擇法院協議公約》爲藍本，不過其只借鑒了後者對判決承認與執行的規定，而沒有借鑒協議管轄規則。然而，目前管轄權衝突是內地與香港區際司法協助中最大的問題，也是《內港判決安排》實施情況不容樂觀的主要原因。因此《內港判決安排》完善之關鍵爲在“一國兩制”原則的指引下，深入内地與香港的域内法，考察兩地對協議管轄制度的規定及實踐，對具體細節問題，包括管轄協議的形式有效性、實質有效性、管轄協議的准據法選擇、管轄協議的效力、管轄協議的限制，進行比較與分析，從中探究兩地對協議管轄制度的協調機制。除此之外，《内港判決安排》的完善還應借鑒布魯塞爾管轄權體系和《海牙選擇法院協議公約》的做法。《内港判決安排》以《海牙選擇法院協議公約》為藍本，其完善必然需要參考《海牙選擇法院協議公約》對管轄協議的規定。布魯塞爾管轄權體系協議管轄規則較《海牙選擇法院協議公約》的規定更為全面，因此對內地與香門港協議管轄制度的協調也具有重要的借鑒意義 關鍵字：內地與香港 協議管轄《內港判決安排》 《海牙選擇法院協議公約》布魯塞附管轄權體系