With the rapid development of economy and science technology in today’s society,many nascent problems emerged,and a new childbearing ideology named surrogacy generated in this circumstance. It brings severe challenges to the traditional way of fertility,childbearing ideology and ethics,even laws and legal regulations. Despite the seriousness of this challenge in China, the attention the government pays is limited. It appears that , specific to the legal dimension, there is no specifically legislation regulate the surrogacy issue except Article 3 of “Assisted Reproductive Technology Management Approach” ， which promulgated by the Ministry of Health in February ,2001. This Article specified that “Medical institutions and medical personnel may not implement any form of surrogacy skill”. Surrogacy not only brings doubts and restless to us, but also brings hope to those infertility families. In this condition, such disregard for the surrogate problem and even hold a overall negative attitude towards surrogacy is not a attitude we may hold for our legal society. Due to the fast-paced economic development, deteriorating ecological environment, increasing living pressure and unhealthy life style, there’s a sharp increase in the number of infertile couples. What we can expect is in the future there will be more and more people who will choose surrogate as a way of bearing babies, in that case, the choice of a all-out ban is obviously extremely undesirable.We should have confidence to face the surrogacy issue and solve it. In terms of bio-medicine, from the perspective of legal norms to study surrogacy, and finally publish a regulation which avoid the disadvantages to the greatest extent, while surrogacy can become ultimate benefit for human society. On the other hand, the Article 3 can’t show the point that surrogacy is illegal, which surrogacy become a gray zone of “what is not prohibited by laws is permitted”, and it will be difficult to supervise and order by the law. III This thesis aims to analyze the legal regulations in respect of surrogacy from different jurisdictions, combine with the situation in mainland China and to come to a conclusion of choice of modes, explore the reasonable regulations which deal with the relationships between parent-child, surrogate mothers’ husband etc.

在当今社会，随着经济、科技的高速发展，许多新生的问题应运而生，代孕 (surrogacy)正是在这种情况下产生的一种新的生育观念。它的出现，对传统的生 育方式、生育观念、伦理道德乃至法律规范都提出了严峻的挑战。较之于这种挑 战的严峻性，中国大陆对于这个问题的重视程度令人担忧，具体到法律层面，则 表现在目前没有专门对代孕问题进行规制的相关立法，仅仅只有卫生部在2001 年2月颁布的《人类辅助生殖技术管理办法》中的第三条涉及，该规章第三条规 定：“医疗机构和医务人员不得实施任何形式的代孕技术。”这种对代孕问题漠 视乃至一刀切给予全盘否定的态度自然不是当下我们这个法制社会应当持有的， 毕竟代孕带给我们疑问和不安的同时，也给许多不孕不育的家庭带去了希望。 现今社会，经济发展节奏快速、生态环境日益恶化，人们生存压力越来越大， 加之不健康的生活习惯越来越多等原因，致使不孕不育夫妻的数量急剧增加。因 此我们可以预期，将来会有越来越多的人选择代孕方式来解决生育问题，既然如 此，全面禁止的选择显然是极为不可取的。我们应该有足够的自信去面对代孕问 题，去解决代孕问题，从生物医学的方面，从伦理道德的层面，从社会生活的角 度，从法律规范的视角去研究代孕，最终颁布出一部最大程度趋利避害的法规， 只有这样才能让这样一种新的事物最终造福于我们人类。从另一方面来说，我国 仅以规章的形式规定医疗机构和医务人员不得实施任何形式的代孕技术，没有出 台相关法律加以规定，并不能说明代孕行为是违法的，这就致使该问题仍处在“法 无明文禁止”的状态，反之，这很可能造成代孕成为一个灰色领域，将难以得到 规范与监管。本文旨在通过分析不同法域在代孕方面的法律规制，结合中国大陆 的具体情况，讨论其可以选择的制度模式，并以合理的规则处理亲子关系、与代 孕母之夫等各种法律主体之间的关系，借鉴域外经验，以期对大陆代孕法律规制 提供可行的模式。